Support PI tag renaming
Tags created by a PI Connector can be renamed, but these renamed points can be "forgotten" if the Connector's point cache is lost. Updating the Tag Mapping configuration file can avoid this cache loss, but I would like to be able to rename Connector tags without updating this configuration file.
We plan to provide users the ability to pick their tag naming convention and not worry about managing a cache file. We are working on implementing this functionality with PI Connector for OPC UA.
Sahil Pillay commented
+1 for having the function in IEC60870-5-104 connectors
Uwe Kullmann commented
Why not using the Instrumenttag field or exdesc for the Interface? Then we can Name the Tag to whatever we want.
Hervé SENIE commented
A must have on connector IEC 60870-5-104
Will you also deploy this functionality with PI Connector for IEC 60870-5-104?
Currently PI Connector for IEC 60870-5-104 does not support tag renaming.
PI Connector for OPC UA version 220.127.116.11 supports PI tag renaming.
Anshul Somani commented
Being able to rename the tags at the PI system level using PI Builder and not having to worry of having them not updated in cache of OPC UA connector would be a great help.
Danielle Desmond commented
I agree that we should be able to rename points between the source and target. I also believe that it would be beneficial to be able to determine and specify the naming convention before the connector creates those tags.
Vikram Thakur commented
Being able to rename a point between the source and target would enable to us develop much quicker. Our lack of standard naming conventions across L3 sites is holding us back from creating global Asset Framework templates and event frames on our L4 systems.
Armin Muljadi commented
Hi, being able to use client's tag naming convention is a must-have in my opinion. Surprised that this is not a default feature. I'd like to request that the same feature to be made available for PI Siemens PCS7 Connector as well. Thanks.
In response to Danny Dijke, "By running the PI Connector for OPC UA i..."
Does this same functionality also exist for PI Connector for IEC-60870-5-104?
Danny Dijke commented
By running the PI Connector for OPC UA in "tag-only mode" you can define a CustomStreamId which will be used to name a PI point. The tag only mode requires a list of manually-specified NodeIds (OPC UA variables), which the connector accesses without browsing.
Can you predict when this option will be available for use?
Mark Eliassen commented
My project has run into a serious difficulty due to a ‘scope gap’ between the various requirements of IEC 60870-5-104 protocol, the associated PI Connector and AF Templating. Let me explain:
A wind farm incorporating about 50 identical wind turbines was completed around end-2018. The SCADA system vendor nominated IEC 60870-5-104 protocol for interfaces with our PI System – and duly configured ASDUs with Information Object Addresses (10000, 10001, 10003, etc). Although the protocol supports tag names, they are not mandatory and were not configured.
Our PI System integrator made the (reasonable) assumption that all of the wind turbines could be configured via a single ‘element template’.
The PI Connector has an auto-configuration feature that cannot be disabled. This feature interrogates the data source and creates PI data points according to ASDU# and IOA# found in the data source. Manually renaming these points would be futile, because the new names would be overwritten (e.g. whenever the connector is restarted).
The reasonable assumption (that all of the wind turbines could be configured via a single ‘element template’) can only be realised when attributes are named such that an attribute name is the same for each turbine (apart from the turbine number).
Can anyone recommend a good work-around please?
Albert Barstad commented
Renaming tags for connectors would be really helpful. The tag name provided by the "source" is not always that intuitive. Eq for the IEC 60870-5-104 tha tagnames are a combo of the CA and IOA adress
Paul Kim commented
Although this is more specific to the BACnet connector, it still applies under here. Currently, if network changes are made that necessitate an IP address change, tags would have to be recreated, whereas with the interface, only changes to the instrumenttag would be needed to reflect the changes to the data source.
Michael Adler commented
If we could set a tag renaming mask using regular expressions it would be extremely helpful. This piece of functionality is a must before we can move to the OPC UA connector. This issue prevents us from using other connectors as well.
Thanks @Diego and @Danny for your questions. We don't have a schedule yet for this item. We are in the process of researching how to best architect this underneath the hood. Our prototype is not in a sharable form so will have to show you once we get closer to beta. Recommend you vote on this item and be sure you are signed up for updates.
Diego Curras commented
Hello @Chris, a customer wants to know if this feature is planned to be integrated on PI Connector for Wonderware Historian. If so, may you give an idea of the timeline of the feature set please ?
Danny Dijke commented
@Chris, can you share the prototype and timeline of the feature set? Thanks
I have a customer who is upgrading from an OPC DA interface to an OPC UA connector. They have an existing tag naming convention, as well as many Excel spreadsheets and PI Datalink functions that already use tag names. They are considering moving to the OPC UA connector but will need a reliable and supported way of maintaining the existing tag names rather than using the connector naming convention.