How can we improve the PI Server?

Improve Management of Asset Analytics

mprove PI AF Analysis Handling in PI System Explorer when working with hundreds of analysis with following features:

- Possibility to sort Analysis/Analysis Templates in alphabetic order by Status, Element, Name, Template

- Possibility to filter Analysis by Status, Element, Name, Template, Backfilling

- Select all filters Analysis to Start/Stop and Start Backfilling
Problem is when a certain set of a analyses are selected so they will be handled in one go. It is not possible to group the required ones in a contiguous section of lines in the PSE Management Add-In, manual selection is taking very much time.

- Stop Backfilling for all selected Analysis !!!
This is needed when a backfill is started and takes a long time, but during that period it is encountered that an expression correction is needed.

54 votes
Sign in
Signed in as (Sign out)

We’ll send you updates on this idea

koettih shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

9 comments

Sign in
Signed in as (Sign out)
Submitting...
  • mathiasparks commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    For the record, Devon Energy has a need and desire for the asset analytics management improvements mentioned by Koettih. We feel that element root filtering should be added as well.

  • Frank Walsh commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Could we add a way to natively export what we see in the Analysis Management Window? Have had a couple customers who wanted to gain a bit more insight than is provided by the management window - could potentially export to CSV and analyze offline to avoid impacting AF Backend performance.

    Analysis Util exports and provides alot of information, but is missing some key metrics. (i.e. Running Status, InError, etc.)

  • Darya Malysheva commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Will it be possible in any future version to filter out not by the element name, but the path to the element? I had a request from customer who would like to filter out analysis that are under specific part of the hierarchy as CompanyName\NPP1, CompanyName\NPP2 etc.

  • AdminStephen Kwan (Product Manager, OSIsoft) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Hi Ken,
    Would you expect the sorting to affect only the page that you're looking at in the Management plugin or would you expect the sorting to affect all the pages? The reason I'm asking is imagine you have 100,000 analyses. In that case, in order to improve performance of the Management plugin, we implemented paging, which means we get back 1 page at a time from the server and display that as soon as possible to improve responsiveness of the user interface. Consequently, if you expect the sorting to affect all the pages together as one, it's much more impactful to performance and overall responsiveness for users with many analyses since we potentially have to retrieve everything before sorting as opposed to sorting only 1 page.

  • ken_reiss commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Allow sorting the search results by the various column headers in the Analysis Seaches located in System Explorer under the Management tab.  Sorting should be as easy as clicking on the column one would like to sort on (Status, Analysis Type, Element, Name, Template, Backfilling).

  • AdminStephen Kwan (Product Manager, OSIsoft) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    With the 2017 release, you can create your own customized search/filtering of analyses in the management plugin. Please provide feedback on whether this suits your needs.

    There are difficulties allowing users to sort a very large list. The management plugin loads analyses by pages into the grid. This dramatically improves performance as we bring back 1 page of data at a time from SQL Server and display it immediately. With additional sorting options, we would need to find a way to sort potentially millions of analyses and then display them. This makes paging much more difficult. In addition, what we have seen is that there are many elements with the same name, for example "pump". In the case of a very large hierarchy, if you were to sort by "pump", you will end up with hundreds if not thousands or more "pump". I'm not sure that's all that useful.

    Your feedback is welcome.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA
COMPLETED