OSIsoft GitHub
-
Make the test reports actionable
Once the test runs and the report is generated, it is not easy to interpret potential failures that are included in the report and the only option is to contact techsupport. It is useful to make the report more actionable to know how to go about troubleshooting potential failures without the need to reach out to Techsupport.
3 votes -
Support Claims Based Authentication in Vision
PI System Deployment Tests will not pass pre-checks in our system because we have configured PI Vision to use claims-based authentication. SDT should support this message as claims is an IT standard.
2 votes -
Allow support for load balanced AF servers
In our environment we have an archive Collective and 2 AF servers coordinated by a network load balancer. The Tests should support a system with load balanced AF servers.
It appears, that even if you set the value AFServer in app.config to one of the 2 AF servers, the pre-checks will still fail if the local instance of System Explorer is connected to AF using the load balancer as the host. I get errors such as these (PIAF is the name of the load balancer).
…OSIsoft.PISystemDeploymentTests.PreliminaryChecks.CheckRtqpEngineServiceTest [STARTING]
System.InvalidOperationException : Cannot open Service Control Manager on computer 'PIAFTest'. This operation might2 votes -
Do Not Require PIADMINS Mapping
The test scripts require that the user running the script have a mapping to the built in group "piadmins". That group is often disabled or removed in production systems and this prevents the test from running.
I understand the scripts are written for vanilla, freshly installed systems but I don't believe such a specific test should be part of a test suite.
1 vote -
Allow different host names and URLs for PI Web API
Our PI Web API uses a DNS. The certificate we use is only valid for the DNS alias, not the machine host name. So in our system, we have the need to use the host name for some pre-checks, and the DNS URL for other pre-checks. Can you please separate these two things out in app.config?
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?