rpalmen

My feedback

  1. 22 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen commented  · 
    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » System Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen commented  · 

    Dealing with the same problem again...
    It appears that the cleanup creates one huge transaction to perform the cleanup. If there is a large backup you need ridiculous amounts of logspace to buildup the transaction. At the moment performing a cleanup, and for a audit log of 110Gb i'm already at a logspace of 75Gb
    With smaller transactions this would be more efficient.

    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  6. 227 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen commented  · 

    Now that Matlab is off the table, any new directions for extensibility of Analytics?

    rpalmen commented  · 

    I appreaciate the step back! While Matlab provides scaleability performance and capabilities on the high-end of the spectrum, there is still a demand on the lower end.
    I do understand the complexities and pitfalls involved (remember Custom DR's), but there should / could be a midway, just like PI Vision seems to strike a midway with it's extensibility. E.g. leaving the data delivery to the custom function to the analysis service, but having the capability to use e.g. C# to implement custom functions within that limited frame.After all we don't want to go back to the days where we open, render and parse Excel files in an ACE module...

    rpalmen commented  · 

    Let me add a current example where we use a custom C# calculation engine for.
    For each batch, and during the batch at every change of the batch phase, we need to calculate the operating window for a number of key process parameters. We trigger the engine based on signups to BatchID and PhaseID. On every change, we lookup some process data, and some AF table, calculate our operating window limits (data series using future data) and write those back to PI Points.

    rpalmen commented  · 

    i think this request is more specific on the external calculation: https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555148-pi-server/suggestions/17219900-extensible-analytics

    rpalmen commented  · 

    I'm a bug fan of AF, yet every decent project i needed to create my own external calculation engines for more complex business logic. I've used SQLserver, OLEBDEnt and linked AF tables, or custom C# engines.
    In all cases i would at least get rid of all the technical plumbing of management, scheduling, security, etc., just like the ACE scheduler was.

    So mechanisms to trigger custom logic, supply the data and provide access, and send back the data to AF.

    If needed, i can supply specific examples i've built for customers.

    rpalmen commented  · 

    This request could go a long way, so maybe this option solves the request in a more broad sense:
    https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555148-pi-server/suggestions/17219900-extensible-analytics

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  7. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen commented  · 

    In response to Stephen Kwan, "Based on your description, it is possibl..."
    Not for this item yet. I did for another client, so i'm quite up-to-date with the release notes.
    We are planning an upgraden soon though.

    rpalmen commented  · 

    In response to Stephen Kwan, "AF 2018 SP2 will have programmatic acces..."
    In this case it's not a problem that i have lagging issues, skipped count is 0 on an evaluationcount of >1B. However i have missed Evaluations as i am missing data points that preview/backfill does reproduce and i can't find the reason why. The parameters don't tell me why one specific analysis fails once every thousand evaluations or so and that's where one would need tracing.

    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » AF Transformer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Event Frames (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  11. 21 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » AF Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Extensibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  13. 16 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  14. 27 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  15. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  17. 27 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  18. 82 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  19. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Vision » Display Management / Displays Page  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen commented  · 

    In response to KASHYAP DAVE, "We are not able to manage Customisable L..."
    Why not direct users to a specific display?
    With the Kiosk mode, and the HideToolbar & HideTimebar parameters this can be a near full-size screen.
     

    rpalmen commented  · 

    Why not direct users to a specific display?
    With the Kiosk mode, and the HideToolbar & HideTimebar parameters this can be a near full-size screen.

  20. 8 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
    rpalmen commented  · 

    This is one of the few items that keep me away from getting rid of OLEDB Enterprise for my reporting.

    rpalmen commented  · 

    Cool! It looks like that feedback on the feedback site is not automatically cross-posted here. That's why we see so many ideas popping up on PI Square.

    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA
COMPLETED