rpalmen

My feedback

  1. 16 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  2. 97 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  myOSIsoft » Customer Portal Overall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  3. 22 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  5. 132 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Installation & Upgrading  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This functionality is currently in development for the PI Vision 2020 release.

    On a clean install, the setup kit will create a self-signed certificate, and apply it to the target IIS web site where PI Vision is being installed. On upgrade, where the previous version already had a certificate set for the PI Vision site, that certificate is used for the new version’s PI Vision web site.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    PS: This applies both to PI Vision and PI Web API installers if both use the same rules to check the certificate.

    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Installation & Upgrading  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    I think this is already implemented (at least in PI Vision 2019)

  8. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    PLANNED  ·  0 comments  ·  myOSIsoft » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  9. 8 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Event Frames (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  10. 125 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  PI Connectors » PI System Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I know a lot of you are really excited about snapshot support for PI System Connector, so I wanted to offer you an update on our release plans.

    Q4 2020 – You can expect to see a PI System Connector release introducing snapshot support for PI Points with the compression attribute set to zero (on the source system).

    Early 2021 – You can expect to see a PI System Connector release that will expand on the Q4 release by adding snapshot configuration options and snapshot support for PI Points with the compression attribute not set to zero (on the source system).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    Now we need to support multiple tools to sync systems: PI2PI and System connector. Moving to a single tool will reduce overall ownership cost.

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  11. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Vision » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  12. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 
    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  13. 40 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » System Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    Dealing with the same problem again...
    It appears that the cleanup creates one huge transaction to perform the cleanup. If there is a large backup you need ridiculous amounts of logspace to buildup the transaction. At the moment performing a cleanup, and for a audit log of 110Gb i'm already at a logspace of 75Gb
    With smaller transactions this would be more efficient.

    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  16. 275 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    Now that Matlab is off the table, any new directions for extensibility of Analytics?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    I appreaciate the step back! While Matlab provides scaleability performance and capabilities on the high-end of the spectrum, there is still a demand on the lower end.
    I do understand the complexities and pitfalls involved (remember Custom DR's), but there should / could be a midway, just like PI Vision seems to strike a midway with it's extensibility. E.g. leaving the data delivery to the custom function to the analysis service, but having the capability to use e.g. C# to implement custom functions within that limited frame.After all we don't want to go back to the days where we open, render and parse Excel files in an ACE module...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    Let me add a current example where we use a custom C# calculation engine for.
    For each batch, and during the batch at every change of the batch phase, we need to calculate the operating window for a number of key process parameters. We trigger the engine based on signups to BatchID and PhaseID. On every change, we lookup some process data, and some AF table, calculate our operating window limits (data series using future data) and write those back to PI Points.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    i think this request is more specific on the external calculation: https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555148-pi-server/suggestions/17219900-extensible-analytics

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    I'm a bug fan of AF, yet every decent project i needed to create my own external calculation engines for more complex business logic. I've used SQLserver, OLEBDEnt and linked AF tables, or custom C# engines.
    In all cases i would at least get rid of all the technical plumbing of management, scheduling, security, etc., just like the ACE scheduler was.

    So mechanisms to trigger custom logic, supply the data and provide access, and send back the data to AF.

    If needed, i can supply specific examples i've built for customers.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    This request could go a long way, so maybe this option solves the request in a more broad sense:
    https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555148-pi-server/suggestions/17219900-extensible-analytics

    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  17. 22 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    In response to Stephen Kwan, "Based on your description, it is possibl..."
    Not for this item yet. I did for another client, so i'm quite up-to-date with the release notes.
    We are planning an upgraden soon though.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rpalmen commented  · 

    In response to Stephen Kwan, "AF 2018 SP2 will have programmatic acces..."
    In this case it's not a problem that i have lagging issues, skipped count is 0 on an evaluationcount of >1B. However i have missed Evaluations as i am missing data points that preview/backfill does reproduce and i can't find the reason why. The parameters don't tell me why one specific analysis fails once every thousand evaluations or so and that's where one would need tracing.

    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  18. 8 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » AF Transformer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
  19. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen shared this idea  · 
  20. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Event Frames (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rpalmen supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA/PREVIEW
COMPLETED