FranzK
My feedback
-
3 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Support for trace markers on a trend is currently in development for an upcoming release of PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
This functionality is currently in development for the PI Vision 2020 release.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
368 votes
In the upcoming PI Vision 2020 release, this functionality is being added that will allow for creating calculations on the fly within PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
We would like to learn more about the different use cases for your independent data streams.
While PI System Connector can support the configuration of data collection from specific branches of a PI AF Database, it seems that there’s also a need expressed here to regarding the destination options which we would like to know more about.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
For different use cases we want to use different AF Databases. With AF Transformer we are able to get AF Structures from one database to another. but at the Moment there is no way to move Event-Frames from one database to another. this is very important if you want to have the context of your data in all your AF Databases. For Example if you have a batch-event-Frame you Need this context also in other AF Databases.
FranzK
shared this idea
·
-
26 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
122 votes
We will soon be moving forward with the addition of Snapshot support for PI System Connector. I look forward to continuing to update you once we move from planning to active development work on this enhancement.
In the meantime, please continue to share your comments regarding Snapshot support for PI System Connector here.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
This topic is already under Research/Evaluating. Is there a new status? It's really important to get this support. Use of additional tools like PI Cloud connect, PItoPI interface,... is not straightforward and not in scope of best practice for an state of the art IT Architecture.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
PI to PI in parallel is not a solution. i expect to have one tool to communicate from a local system to a global system. there should be a straight forward way to connect one PI System to another and not different combinations of tools. another reason, the communication from local to global should be secured (it's with the connector, but not with PI to PI). so the connector should be able to:
-communicate historical data based on archive
-communicate snapshots in real-time mode
-full AF/EF supportFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
-
2 votes
-
76 votes
-
2 votes
-
8 votes
-
7 votes
-
4 votes
a use case might be to define flexible routing of data. e.g. on the local system we have different departments. this departments might be handled with different data sources. the departments need to access these data in dedicated AF databases on global side. so a flexible routing data-source to destination is needed.
Another use case is to differentiate data based on GMP-context. so there is a Destination for GMP Data and one for non-GMP Data