FranzK
My feedback
-
1 voteFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
127 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this enhancement soon? especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this enhancement soon? especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this (i think technically easy to develop) enhancement. especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Hi Victor, i suggest it should be possible to configure the behavior. i would personally assign color by attribute and distinguish the batches by line style and or line weight. but others might prefer to distinguish by color. this configuration should be possible on display level.
there should also be other possibilities for overlay trend like, arrange them free on the display, add multiple y-scales and configure these scales flexible.FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
94 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
i think this request is related to https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555139-pi-connectors/suggestions/41720188-implement-the-option-to-choose-between-append-or-r
So it might be useful to merge to get a better view about the need for this requirement.FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
We understand that for slow changing points, values might not change often and thus there is a need to collect values at certain time intervals as opposed to on change. However, scanning at frequent intervals leads to increased load on the server and thus can lead to performance degradation. We are discussing how best to solve this problem with PI Connector for OPC UA.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Development continues for PI Adapter for RDBMS, with Lighthouse opportunities coming soon.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
We are in the process of developing this feature for the PI Adapter for OPC UA. Please continue to share your use cases with us in the comments.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
We have started developing a PI Adapter for Structured Data Files.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
This feedback item has been moved from the PI Connectors forum to the PI Adapters forum.
We are continuing to support the PI Connector for OPC UA with stability and security releases. However, for feature enhancements, we are considering them for the PI Adapter for OPC UA. We would like to hear more about your use cases for this functionality, so please share with us in the comments.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
we also use WinCC and other scada systems. about what to collect/ not collect, there should be same filtering possible like in the scada system itself, so i want the possibility to filter on every attribute the scada system offers. Naming for event frame should also be possible. E.g. Asset_Alarmtext or Alarmtext_Messageclass,...
The eventframes should be built without using PI Tags (Tagrefference). The behaviour of the end of eventframe (end eventframe when alarm is gone or with quitting) should be configurable in the connector -
17 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
It's important to get this soon as possible. Base Requirement to the System Connector is to have identical Data on source and destination Data Archive. This only works with append. at the moment it works with replace (in my opinion a bug - the feature might be replace).
-
84 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
Would there be a chance to get this enhancement soon? especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.