FranzK
My feedback
-
24 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
456 votes
At this time, this item is not currently scheduled for a release of PI Vision. If this changes, this item will be updated to reflect the current status.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
i'm disappointed how this is handled. OSISoft always refers to PI Feedback to get topics included. now there is a high vote-count and the requirements from the PI users are still ignored.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
will there also be the possibility to configure 21-cfr support (electronic signature)?
FranzK
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
i saw more post with different wording for the same topic. OSISoft should think about managing feedback (e.g. merge similar topics). all in all i think Manual Data Entry already has more than 100 votes!
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
custom symbols is under full support. so it's hard to use in a regulated environment (e.g. pharmaceutical industries). it would also be great to get the possibility to configure electronic signature (FDA Part11) for the symbol (configure, so it's possible to activate if needed).
-
32 votes
Development is underway for enabling deletes with PI System Connector. I look forward to bringing you additional updates when they are available.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
How about the state of this request? This request might help to ensure data quality. As deleting data should be handled carefully, i agree with Todd to make it configureable at least at the connector level (maybe even more granular e.g. based on the local point source or other point attributes).
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Global configuration for an append write behavior is underway. I look forward to bringing you additional updates once they are available.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Are there any news on this topic? it would be great if it gets implemented soon. it will help to ensure required data quality. i suggest to make this configuration granular, so we are able to choose what tags should use append or replace mode.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
It's important to get this soon as possible. Base Requirement to the System Connector is to have identical Data on source and destination Data Archive. This only works with append. at the moment it works with replace (in my opinion a bug - the feature might be replace).
-
2 votes
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
this feedback post might also be a way to solve my problem:
https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/320517-pi-vision/suggestions/10622604-filter-attributes-in-the-attributes-section-of-the?_ga=2.121009544.1652227482.1632324899-139286360.1601990297is it possible to merge both posts? all in all, these posts try to solve the same problem.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Whats the Status of this request? When there a lot of Attributes in one Element, it's really hard to find the needed Attribute. Even there Categories. The ability to collapse and expand attributes-groups (based on the categories) would be really helpful. If Collapsing/Expanding is not possible a filter function for the Attributes (e.g. filtering on categories, datatype,...) would help.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
The following link might also support my use case.
https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/320517-pi-vision/suggestions/31347571-add-ability-to-collapse-expand-attribute-categoryall in all it's hard to find the right attributes if the element contains a lot of attributes (e.g. some hundreds). in this case it would be good to filter for this attributes or to group them e.g. by categories (already possible) and collapse / expand them (not possible).
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
134 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this enhancement soon? especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this enhancement soon? especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
118 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this enhancement soon? especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Would there be a chance to get this (i think technically easy to develop) enhancement. especially after end of life for Processbook, it's important Processbooks functionalities in PI Vision.
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
Hi Victor, i suggest it should be possible to configure the behavior. i would personally assign color by attribute and distinguish the batches by line style and or line weight. but others might prefer to distinguish by color. this configuration should be possible on display level.
there should also be other possibilities for overlay trend like, arrange them free on the display, add multiple y-scales and configure these scales flexible.FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
102 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FranzK
commented
i think this request is related to https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555139-pi-connectors/suggestions/41720188-implement-the-option-to-choose-between-append-or-r
So it might be useful to merge to get a better view about the need for this requirement.FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
75 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
This is still an important topic. The number of votes and comments shows how hard this feature is needed. To make it a whole solution, it would be great to include electronic signature functionality (make it configureable, so the customer is able to enable or disable the ESIG funcionality for each symbol)