FranzK
My feedback
-
2 votes
-
1 vote
-
64 votes
-
1 vote
-
5 votes
-
6 votes
-
1 vote
We would like to learn more about the different use cases for your independent data streams.
While PI System Connector can support the configuration of data collection from specific branches of a PI AF Database, it seems that there’s also a need expressed here to regarding the destination options which we would like to know more about.
-
3 votes
-
4 votes
-
3 votesFranzK
shared this idea
·
-
21 votes
How would you like to track this information? For example, is it sufficient to be a message in a log file, a performance counter? Do you want to maintain the history of all the changes you want on this flag? This will help us understand how to implement it.
-
8 votesFranzK
commented
It should also be possible to filter for Detail options like Attributename, old Value, new value.
also a filter for specific columns would be helpful.
Sorting by columns is also needed. When Audit Trail is already filtered by calling based on the context of an Element, it should already Remove columns not needed (e.g. path and Elementname - should be shown in the header) and include Detail information.FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
210 votes
At this time, this item is not currently scheduled for a release of PI Vision. If this changes, this item will be updated to reflect the current status.
FranzK
commented
i'm disappointed how this is handled. OSISoft always refers to PI Feedback to get topics included. now there is a high vote-count and the requirements from the PI users are still ignored.
FranzK
commented
will there also be the possibility to configure 21-cfr support (electronic signature)?
FranzK
supported this idea
·
FranzK
commented
i saw more post with different wording for the same topic. OSISoft should think about managing feedback (e.g. merge similar topics). all in all i think Manual Data Entry already has more than 100 votes!
FranzK
commented
custom symbols is under full support. so it's hard to use in a regulated environment (e.g. pharmaceutical industries). it would also be great to get the possibility to configure electronic signature (FDA Part11) for the symbol (configure, so it's possible to activate if needed).
-
194 votes
-
6 votes
-
108 votes
-
27 votes1 comment · PI Integrators » PI Integrator for Business Analytics · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →FranzK
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
This item is under technical review. Currently, support for collecting Snapshot data can be achieved via PI to PI interface and should be considered for achieving this specific functionality.
FranzK
commented
PI to PI in parallel is not a solution. i expect to have one tool to communicate from a local system to a global system. there should be a straight forward way to connect one PI System to another and not different combinations of tools. another reason, the communication from local to global should be secured (it's with the connector, but not with PI to PI). so the connector should be able to:
-communicate historical data based on archive
-communicate snapshots in real-time mode
-full AF/EF supportFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFranzK
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesFranzK
commented
Meanwhile it would be great to get an whitepaper how to manually rollback a wrong configured connector . unfortunately it's very easy, to do a wrong configuration (e.g. include all PI Tags from PI Server, forget to set a prefix,...) or an typo occurs during configuration. It would be very bad to have "dead configurations" in the System or need to setup the whole system again.
FranzK
supported this idea
·
I want to track this information by a message in the Audit Trail Viewer Application. it should be immediately visible (e.g. in red font) if in the searched time-range the audit trail was switched of (include the information when it was switched off/on and from whom).