AdminStephen Kwan
(Product Manager, OSIsoft)
My feedback
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment We are continuing to evaluate and prioritize our backlog. This idea will be update if the status changes.
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Thank you for your comment.
-
141 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment This has not been scheduled.
An error occurred while saving the comment This is currently in our backlog but has not been scheduled yet.
An error occurred while saving the comment We are collecting requirements for this. Please provide your needs in terms of how many levels of child event frames you would need, whether you need to reference other event frames, etc. Please describe your use cases.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Please clarify which PSE screen this request is for.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Can you clarify which product you're referring to?
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Auto-recalculate an event frame analysis is very different than auto-recapture values. In order to perform auto-recalculation of event frame analyses, we would need to keep an eye on out-of-order data that would've triggered an event frame analyses and proceed from there. That's manageable since we just need to keep track of the trigger tags for the analyses. Meanwhile, auto-recapture values in any event frame is much more complicated as we would need to keep track of everything that may affect a captured value. Imagine you have 10 million event frames and what we would need to keep track of.
We have to assume that the auto-recapture event frames would apply to event frames NOT created by analyses.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Are you referring to analysis output tags? If so, can you tell me your use case? Is there a technical reason or is it just your preference to build them as Base rather than Classic?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Bart, real time calculation with analyses include a default wait time of 5 seconds (configurable). Therefore in your scenario of both triggers arriving at the same time, both values would be included in the calculations. More importantly, if real time calculations and recalculations use different logic, then which result is correct? Perhaps in your case you should have two analyses with different logic generating two different result sets.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Would you only have True/False as your possible states?
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Since the first release of Asset Framework v2.x in December of 2007, it has always supported only Microsoft SQL Server as the database backend. As such we have a very large investment both in software code and testing infrastructure to support this configuration. We have recently received some customer requests for Asset Framework to additionally support AWS RDS as the database backend, as evident by this User Voice idea. We have not tested Asset Framework with AWS RDS as the database backend and thus it is currently not a supported configuration. The product management team at OSIsoft continually evaluate customer requests and feedbacks. This idea will be assessed and prioritized along with all the other ideas for Asset Framework and if we decide to start work on this idea, we will adjust the User Voice status accordingly. Please continue to vote and provide detailed use cases to help us prioritize our backlog.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Please advise which PI Connector you're using.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment This is an example of ad hoc calculations for PI Vision displays. As such, I'm moving this idea to the PI Vision section.
-
86 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Our current development cycle does not include this request. We will update this idea if the status changes.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment There are complexities associated with this idea in that we would need to know the content of the archives both from the source and also destination. Did I understand your request correctly?
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment PI System Explorer (PSE) is just an AF SDK client. Fundamentally it's no different than any other AF SDK client such as PI Vision. As such, PSE uses the AF SDK to interact with data stored in the AF Server (SQL Server) and Data Archive. When you retrieve data in PSE, the AF SDK tries to retrieve the data and in the case of a missing PI Point, PSE (as a client) interprets that and shows "PI Point not found". Similarly, PI Vision is doing the same thing as an AF SDK client. In order to achieve what you're describing, the best way to accomplish that is probably to implement an option in PI Vision to ignore these errors. As such, I'm moving this idea over to the PI Vision area.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment In PI System Explorer, which itself is an AF SDK client, it is in fact true that you're changing the Display UOM of the relevant attribute within the PI System Explorer graphical user interface. One must take note that this is a client side setting.
User often forgets that PI System Explorer is just an AF SDK client and nothing more. It is not possible to change the Display UOM in PI System Explorer and then persist that same Display UOM automatically in another AF SDK client unless one changes what is stored in the database. When you change the Display UOM in PI System Explorer, that change is only valid within the context of that particular AF SDK client.
If your desired end goal is to change the shown UOM in PI Vision, which itself is an AF SDK client, please vote for the relevant idea under the PI Vision feedback section.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks Asle, we'll look into this.
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi, can you provide some example use cases? What type of events are you trying to capture with event frames?
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi,
While we continue to evaluate the relative priority of this request, have you considered using PI Builder to help with your configuration needs? -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Please help me understand why you wouldn't just remove this analysis if it's permanently disabled in the template?
Please describe what kind of information is in the Description?