GuilhermeFerreira

My feedback

  1. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    TELL US MORE  ·  Joy Wang responded

    Please specify what kind of high availability is requested. For PI Integrator for BA to run in a highly available fashion?

    To support other applications that are highly available? If so, which ones?

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Interfaces » Other Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  3. 39 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  4. 65 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  5. 58 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  6. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    There is still no plan for increasing this limitation?
    Isn't 100k too little?

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Data Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  8. 9 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Data Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Could you please provide more details and examples of what you want to do? The Archive Subsystem already manages the files in memory, and in the file system cache. So, what are your specific situations where you see inefficient memory usage today?

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  9. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  10. 20 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  11. 23 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Server » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    I've just notice the link below is under PI Vision subject.
    I was actually more interested in the tag search within PI Builder!
    As it is the most convenient way to create\edit tags in bulk (replacement for the PI Tag Configurator) I need to be able to search tags by instrumenttag, exdesc, locationX, etc...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    This idea https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/320517-pi-vision/suggestions/10756257-search-for-tags-by-tag-attributes-tag-advanced-se should be considered together with the current one. If there will be consistency across all clients, the old Tag Search should be preferable.

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  12. 65 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Vision » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    I've just noticed this idea is under PI Vision subject. I was looking specifically for "tag search".
    My bad!
    This idea https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555148-pi-server/suggestions/31121275-tag-search-gui-consistency-among-client-tools should be considered.

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    This is extremely important for PI Builder! As it is the most convenient way to create\edit tags in bulk (replacement for the PI Tag Configurator) I need to be able to search tags by instrumenttag, exdesc, locationX, etc...

  13. 12 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Look & Feel / Styling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    Most importantly size and font!

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    I believe this current suggestion could wrap this other one
    https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/320517-pi-vision/suggestions/32171926-pi-vision-2017-setting-table-comparison-table-row
    which is extremely important in my opinion. Not being able to format font size can make table impracticable!

  14. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  15. 247 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  PI Vision » Look & Feel / Styling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    This is a urgent matter. Depending on your dashboard, it is simply impossible to read data in an asset comparison table.

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  16. 11 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  17. 354 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  18. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Data Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira shared this idea  · 
  19. 17 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Connectors » OPC UA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
  20. 30 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Connectors » UFL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    TELL US MORE  ·  Chris Coen responded

    I’m not sure why this would be needed. In the UFL connector you need to specify the name of the tag that you write to. And if that tag already exists, it will write to it. If that tag does not exist, then the connector would create that tag with your desired tag name. Why would you want the connector not to create that tag?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GuilhermeFerreira commented  · 

    I also think the auto creation is not always desirable. Like Wilson Laizo said, the connector will not always create the tag with correct parameters. And in many cases you may simply get a typo in the tag name which would lead to the creation of a new unwanted tag.
    It just happened to me that the source files contained tags between double quotes and they were considered part of the name. So I ended up with new tags like UFL.%22Tagname%22 (%22 would be the " character encoded). Of course I just edited my INI file to read something like TAG = ["*,*,\"(*)\",*"], but the "damage" of all data processed to an undesirable tag was done.

    GuilhermeFerreira supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
TELL US MORE
EVALUATING
PLANNED
IN DEVELOPMENT
COMPLETED
DECLINED