volljm

My feedback

  1. 19 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm shared this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Data Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Data Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm shared this idea  · 
  6. 33 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Vision » Display Management / Displays Page  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  7. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  PI Connectors » New PI Connector request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Manageability » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  9. 60 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Vision » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  10. 15 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm commented  · 

    to reiterate a point above . . . one bad data point (coercion failure) will cause the ENTIRE trace to fail, whether its 1h or 30d. Regardless of whether that one data point should be handled differently, its seem rather problematic that one bad data point can cause the entire trace to fail

    volljm supported this idea  · 
  12. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  13. 29 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  14. 29 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm commented  · 

    meierke1 references this being the same request as another. The other one reads differently to me. The other one was also completed in Server 2018. I see nothing in the release notes concerning the ability to schedule analysis weekly or monthly . . . so it does not appear completed yet.

    We have not moved to Server 2018 quite yet . . . so someone can correct me if i'm wrong about whats in the release notes.

    volljm commented  · 

    'weekly' would be another somewhat common period for KPI type analyses in AF

    volljm supported this idea  · 
  15. 27 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Look & Feel / Styling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  16. 30 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  17. 130 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    volljm supported this idea  · 
  18. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  19. 38 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Ad Hoc Analysis  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    volljm supported this idea  · 
  20. 85 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    volljm commented  · 

    The combination of circular references and Automatic recalculation is hugely problematic. There are a number of ways to inadvertently create a circular reference and the methods for identifying them, especially if they are not your own analyses, can be incredibly tedious.

    Circular References cause Automatic Recalculation to endlessly loop through recalculations. There is no proactive way to identify this as a problem. It eventually can be noticed by manual backfills being in the queue for longer than normal . . . or by an eagle-eyed user noticing that certain analyses continuously flip into the 'backfilling' status.

    volljm supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA
COMPLETED