Paul Booth

My feedback

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paul Booth commented  · 

    Having seen how the current configuration seems to work, it would look like it could be a rewrite.

    If a JSON format text file were used as the base, then any text editor could be used. Possibly like the UFL interface where the ICU reads in an INI file, then provides guidance as how to proceed. This could be a utility tool that reads in a JSON text, allows further editing, then imports into AF, or just leaves the file to be read by the channel when it starts up. Maybe similar to StringBuilder in the current client? That allows substitution parameters wherever.

    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  2. 101 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paul Booth commented  · 

    Absolutely dreadful retrograde move. A cynic might think OSISoft is deliberately setting out to make life hard for firms who support multiple customers so as to get the support work itself.

    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  3. 162 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paul Booth commented  · 

    Again, we are left with a sub-standard visualization tool. Whatever were you thinking when you didn't bother to include UOM selection? These basic things, things ProcessBook can do with ease, should have been put in as a matter of course - we shouldn't have to be begging for basics. Instead we have, as commented, a requirement to duplicate attributes just to do basic unit adjustments, breaking our naming conventions and trouncing your own AF development best practices.

    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  4. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Vision » Navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  5. 134 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  6. 94 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  7. 127 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Vision » Manual Data Entry  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
  8. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Paul Booth supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paul Booth commented  · 

    This is a requirement that I, and a number of other users, have identified as being very useful.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
TELL US MORE
EVALUATING
PLANNED
IN DEVELOPMENT
COMPLETED
DECLINED