ken_reiss

My feedback

  1. 33 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  RtReports » Generator  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  RtReports » Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  myOSIsoft » Customer Portal Overall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  5. 94 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  myOSIsoft » Customer Portal Overall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ken_reiss commented  · 

    This is a royal pain for any consulting firm or for individuals that support numerous OSI clients. I myself have at least a dozen and only have email addresses with about 3 of those clients.

    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  6. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Installation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Event Frames (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  8. 105 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  PI Vision » Event Comparison Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  10. 17 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Interfaces » Other Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  11. 117 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  12. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Interfaces » Modbus Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Interfaces » Other Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
    ken_reiss shared this idea  · 
  14. 9 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Interfaces » Other Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Does this request refer to the Setpoint property of the Loop object type, the Setpoint_Reference property of that type, or something different? The interface currently cannot read Setpoint_Reference, but it can read Setpoint using a float32 PI point.

    ken_reiss shared this idea  · 
  15. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
    ken_reiss shared this idea  · 
  16. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Data Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
    ken_reiss shared this idea  · 
  17. 20 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » System Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  18. 17 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  19. 17 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Manageability » Health  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    OSIsoft is committed to providing customers with a more manageable system. We are working hard to solve the problems of deployment, security, and standardized health messaging within our products.

    PI System Health and PI System Directory were early steps in the manageability story, and we learned a lot thanks to significant customer testing and feedback. We also discovered that there is much more to making a truly manageable system through these engagements.  In order to pursue these larger needs surrounding manageability, we will not be releasing PI System Health, and we are putting PI System Directory on maintenance so that our engineering resources can be allocated toward these bigger efforts. As such, there are no additional enhancements for PI System Directory planned at this time.

    As a result, the status of this suggestion will be changed back to “No status” for the time being. Future status updates will be communicated here.

    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
  20. 17 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Manageability » Health  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    OSIsoft is committed to providing customers with a more manageable system. We are working hard to solve the problems of deployment, security, and standardized health messaging within our products.

    PI System Health and PI System Directory were early steps in the manageability story, and we learned a lot thanks to significant customer testing and feedback. We also discovered that there is much more to making a truly manageable system through these engagements.  In order to pursue these larger needs surrounding manageability, we will not be releasing PI System Health, and we are putting PI System Directory on maintenance so that our engineering resources can be allocated toward these bigger efforts. As such, there are no additional enhancements for PI System Directory planned at this time.

    As a result, the status of this suggestion will be changed back to “No status” for the time being. Future status updates will be communicated here.

    ken_reiss supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA/PREVIEW
COMPLETED