Francis2
My feedback
-
2 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
65 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
From this item description it looks like the major pain point with existing RDBMS interface is providing configuration information (to the tags and interface). I would like to understand more if the request behind the connector is to solely minimize providing configuration information to the existing interface and tags?
Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
122 votes
We will soon be moving forward with the addition of Snapshot support for PI System Connector. I look forward to continuing to update you once we move from planning to active development work on this enhancement.
In the meantime, please continue to share your comments regarding Snapshot support for PI System Connector here.
Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
We are aware of the interest in this functionality, but at this time it is not in our short-term plans to implement.
We would like to learn more about the different scenarios in which you would be syncing your Analyses and Notifications.
Please continue to share your use cases here.Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
121 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFrancis2
shared this idea
·
-
14 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
125 votesRESEARCHING / EVALUATING · 1 comment · PI Server » Analytics & Calculations · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Unfortunately due to unforeseen circumstances, this has not been completed. It needs to be re-prioritized for a later release.
Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesFrancis2
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
This functionality is currently in development for the PI Vision 2020 release.
Users will be able do an exact search and be able to do wildcard search by adding asterisks.
Francis2
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
It would see it like for every entry in the AF structure: Elements / Attributes / Analysis name / Notification Rule name/ ... and only as a multi language. Local Terminology can be considered as a language. I would not want to see it just to deviate from the standard template, that is just the purpose of a standard = all the same! So a language would be applied to the complete structure and would be able to be turned on or off. I would not want to go find out what part is local terminology or not when browsing over a structure. Items that have no language/alternate name would still show as the original language when the local language is applied.