Francis2

My feedback

  1. 10 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Connectors » UFL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Connectors » Wonderware Historian  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  3. 52 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  5. 55 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Vision » AF Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  6. 52 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Connectors » New PI Connector request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    From this item description it looks like the major pain point with existing RDBMS interface is providing configuration information (to the tags and interface). I would like to understand more if the request behind the connector is to solely minimize providing configuration information to the existing interface and tags?

    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  7. 66 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  PI Connectors » PI System Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This item is under technical review. Currently, support for collecting Snapshot data can be achieved via PI to PI interface and should be considered for achieving this specific functionality.

    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  8. 23 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Connectors » PI System Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have considered including this functionality natively as part of the PI system as opposed to including this in the connector.

    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  9. 82 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Vision » Mobile: Phone  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Connectors » Other specific PI Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 shared this idea  · 
  11. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI DataLink » Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  12. 102 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  13. 30 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  14. 8 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  15. 19 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 commented  · 

    It would see it like for every entry in the AF structure: Elements / Attributes / Analysis name / Notification Rule name/ ... and only as a multi language. Local Terminology can be considered as a language. I would not want to see it just to deviate from the standard template, that is just the purpose of a standard = all the same! So a language would be applied to the complete structure and would be able to be turned on or off. I would not want to go find out what part is local terminology or not when browsing over a structure. Items that have no language/alternate name would still show as the original language when the local language is applied.

    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  16. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PI DataLink » Installation & Upgrading  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  17. 11 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francis2 supported this idea  · 
  18. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA
COMPLETED