MarkGoepel

My feedback

  1. 43 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkGoepel commented  · 

    Key points
    • Cost - cost is a function of supportability, lean methodology, on demand usage and end to end automation.
    • Automation - our organisation requires our platforms to be “single click” deployments we can build on demand for testing and are representative of our production environment.
    • Support - consistent environments that are standard driven and IaC managed makes support significantly easier. We run a lean support team and need as much of the platform left for AWS
    • Agility - we need to be able to test, deploy and evaluate platform changes much more quickly than we currently can
    • In essence, we prefer our platforms to be self healing and light touch
    RDS is a known quantity and we don’t believe our request is unique. Support for RDS is well documented by AWS and we have provided some key points.
    We don’t believe any of the current limitations of RDS are requirements of the PI AF system but are open to a conversation on this.
    Our DBA advises that PI AF and PI Vision Databases are the last two remaining databases hosted on an EC2 instance of SQL Server.
    In the immediate timeframe, our pain point is around AF PIFD, and PI Vision SQL Server Databases.
    The BA Integrator and other SQL Server databases are not of concern at this stage. We would prefer to progress the support for AF Server and PI Vision in the first instance, and do not feel it necessary to wait for all SQL Server components of the PI System to be qualified.
    We are committed to working with OSIsoft and AWS to assist in the testing and qualification process.

  2. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  myOSIsoft » Customer Portal Overall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel shared this idea  · 
  3. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  myOSIsoft » Customer Portal Overall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
  4. 48 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
  5. 24 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Vision » Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkGoepel commented  · 

    I agree with Cameron
    The PI Perfmon interface is extremely powerful. All OSIsoft products should expose perf counters, as a matter of course.

    Hint: AF Server!!!!!

    Thanks
    Cheers MG

    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
  6. 34 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » PI Builder  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkGoepel commented  · 

    I agree. What would be exceedingly useful would be able to maintain the DESIGN of an AF Table with PI Builder.
    Right now, it is very easy to copy and paste the actual data contained in the table between Excel and PSE, so this is more about the actual column design (PSE Define Table tab) of the table.

    OK, just realised I cannot add a screenshot to this feedback form.
    I will post another feedback entry suggesting that.

  7. 52 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkGoepel commented  · 

    Additionally, the ability to colour table fields, on multistate, just like the P I Web Parts would enable us to throw away our Process Books in dashboards which requires too much maintenance overhead these days...

  8. 104 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RESEARCHING / EVALUATING  ·  23 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkGoepel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkGoepel commented  · 

    John has proposed some functionality that would solve some very real world issues for us.  If we can chop up some strings, we will be able to improve the quality of integration we have to our systems, for Well and Compressor Work Management System.
    Right now, we have to maintain a set of tables for Table Lookup to be able to provide the strings that are already encoded within a string attribute we already have.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA/PREVIEW
COMPLETED