Alistair

My feedback

  1. 105 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  3. 23 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  4. 98 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  5. 270 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  6. 23 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alistair commented  · 

    I'm not sure that this is possible. I think the original questioner wanted \\AFServer\DB1\ElementA to be a reference to AFServer\DB2\ElementA and for all the attributes of ElementA on DB2, along with all its child elements and their attributes, to be available in DB1 as if they had been defined there.

    As Patrice has suggested, this would need a new type of weak reference, basically saying 'link to location x in this other AF hierarchy'. I don't think this is what Stephen is describing.

    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair shared this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  10. 20 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  11. 92 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  12. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Connectors » PI System Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As suggested in the description of this item, PI System Connector uses AF database as the primary source and thus any filtering that is desired at the PI Tag level can be accomplished by referencing only those tags in the source AF database. If users would only like to replicate PI tags without an AF model, then PI-to-PI interface can serve as an alternate option.

    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  13. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Connectors » PI System Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are aware of the interest in this functionality, but at this time it is not in our short-term plans to implement.

    We would like to learn more about the different scenarios in which you would be syncing your Analyses and Notifications.
    Please continue to share your use cases here.

    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  14. 131 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  15. 19 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair shared this idea  · 
  16. 56 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair shared this idea  · 
  17. 36 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Extensibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  18. 106 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Authoring Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  19. 100 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alistair supported this idea  · 
  20. 329 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Alistair supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA/PREVIEW
COMPLETED