MAl

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Event Frames (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl commented  · 

    I perfectly agree. I think a dedicated section menu inside PI System Explorer would be appropriate. Maybe configuration should be saved inside AF database instead of .ini files.

    MAl supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Vision » Event Comparison Displays  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 
    MAl commented  · 

    Unfortunately OSIsoft decided to abandon ProcessBook and the possibility of getting Event Frames in it (what a pity!).

    I also wish we could give users the ability to reuse quickly their own displays made with PI BatchView but, on the base of my understanding , at the current time there is no hope: PI Batch data are not visible in PI Vision and they cannot be automatically migrated to EF. So every site should be charged first for a migration plan from [PI MDB,Batches] to [PI AF,Event Frames], and then should work on recreating the same or similar BatchView displays.

    In my opinion a sort of add-on in PI Vision making PI Batch data as visible would be appropriate: the possibility of migrating PI ProcessBook displays should also include the ones containing PI BatchView symbols and the visibility to relative data.

  3. 145 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Interfaces » Batch Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Interfaces » Batch Interfaces  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 
  7. 24 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Interfaces » PI ICU  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl shared this idea  · 
  8. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Interfaces » PI ICU  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl commented  · 

    Interesting idea the one of the AF, even if I have some doubt about how reliable could be the Windows authentication: PI interface node and PI server are normally segregated by firewalls and not in the same domain. In similar cases (i.e. when using a PI EMDVB interface to Event Frames) we happened to get some inexplicable unauthorized errors that later disappeared again inexplicably. Today (with PI MDB) we set easily a PI trust and just open port 5450/tcp.

    MAl supported this idea  · 
  9. 11 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Events (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MAl supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA
COMPLETED