Wilson Laizo Filho

My feedback

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
    Wilson Laizo Filho shared this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wilson Laizo Filho commented  · 

    Our use case is the following:
    We use categories to act like filters (or metadata) in order to get the attributes that we want.
    And we have a template that have all the attributes that are possible, as we want to define UOM, point type, etc.
    But, for example, each attribute can be a KPI, KCI, KSI or Optional and we need to filter the attributes by that, for example, only get the attributes marked as KPI. So, we intended to mark those attributes using a category called KPI, KCI, KSI or Optional but this classification could be changed by the user. So, in our case, the Template indicates our Recommended approach while the user could change to better represent his own asset.

    So, as we cannot use Categories for that and we don't have an equivalent "metadata like" way of filtering those attributes, we had to use an inner attribute in order to work with this functionality, but that adds a problem as we cannot (for what I can tell) filter attributes based on a inner attribute value.

    Another problem is that we want to calculate compliance for those, but in the same way, or we first discover if the attribute is of a given type and then look for those compliance's, or (what we did) we create a formula inside of the main attribute for each type (KPI, KCI, KSI, Optional) and then in the formula we check if that attribute is of that type and if it is we calculate, if not, we set "No Result". This approach was recommended by OSIsoft as we needed to do a Rollup of those values and that was the only way to filter it as Rollups also cannot check inner attributes to filter what to rollup.

    So, ideally if the asset is marked as Extendable we would like the possibility to change the category (add/remove) or, at the very least, be able to add other categories so your premise is not broken as all the assets that were created based on the template have everything their parent have, but each asset created can Expand (or Extend) adding additional categories to be a more specialized object.

  4. 23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Connectors » UFL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    TELL US MORE  ·  Chris Coen responded

    Thank you for reaching out. We can extend the connector to support the NTLM authentication, which falls under Windows Authentication. Would it meet your needs?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wilson Laizo Filho commented  · 

    In my case, yes.

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  5. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  6. 83 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PI Developer Technologies » PI Web API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wilson Laizo Filho commented  · 

    Right now we are trying to find some problems with our current WebAPI 2017R2 and without these it's been pretty hard. I can get some of the values looking at the Debug/Audit logs, but it takes a lot of time. Things like Average response time, Number of calls per second/minute, total number of calls, failed requests, maybe a different counter for each different type of call (POST, GET, BATCH, etc).

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  7. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  8. 34 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Joy Wang responded

    Correction to earlier comment by Matt Ziegler: This idea was not fulfilled in PI Integrator for Business Analytics 2018 release. This idea is currently not planned for a future release. If you have a use case and desired behavior for a particular writer and want to discuss further, please comment below or email me. Thank you!

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  9. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  10. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  11. 183 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    EVALUATING  ·  16 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  12. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wilson Laizo Filho commented  · 

    We have the exact problem mentioned by Rick Davin, we try to do a rollup of a summary counting the number of children elements, but when there's no element it gives us Calc Error instead of 0.
    In this regard, I think this should be considered a bug because if I'm counting and there's no child, the answer should be 0 instead of Calc Failed. I understand that probably for Average or other calculations an error is more appropriated, but for Count it does not make sense.

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  13. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  15. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  16. 166 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    EVALUATING  ·  22 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  17. 130 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  18. 60 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  19. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Joy Wang responded

    Correction to earlier comment made by Matt Zieger: PI Integrator for Business Analytics 2018 does not support bulk column configuration. This idea is currently not planned. Feel free to contact me if you’d like to discuss more. Thank you!

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
  20. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wilson Laizo Filho commented  · 

    In our case we want to use the Attribute Categories in a dynamical way.
    The reason for that is that we want to use Rollout calculations and we want to programatically be able to change which attribute will show in the rollup for each element.
    Without this feature we would need to create a template for each combination, and that would not be reasonable as it would require changing an element template.
    Another option would be if Rollups could check the value of certain attributes, similar to a SUMIF in Excel (I want an Average of the Attribute X if the Attribute X|Active have the value 1)

    Wilson Laizo Filho supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
TELL US MORE
EVALUATING
PLANNED
IN DEVELOPMENT
COMPLETED
DECLINED