Joebwv

My feedback

  1. 120 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PI Vision » Mobile: Phone  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Connectors » Other specific PI Connector  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  3. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  5. 87 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PI Vision » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  6. 98 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  7. 23 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » Look & Feel / Styling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  8. 63 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  PI Connectors » New PI Connector request  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    From this item description it looks like the major pain point with existing RDBMS interface is providing configuration information (to the tags and interface). I would like to understand more if the request behind the connector is to solely minimize providing configuration information to the existing interface and tags?

    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  9. 51 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  10. 227 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  PI Vision » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  11. 65 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  12. 38 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  13. 114 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  14. 117 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  15. 126 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  16. 135 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  17. 160 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  PI Vision » Symbols  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  18. 20 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joebwv supported this idea  · 
  19. 131 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We have been gathering use cases and information about OPC UA Server functionality as it pertains to OSIsoft products.

    There are a number of different requirements to consider, and as such we’re changing the status back to “UNDER REVIEW / RESEARCHING” to more accurately reflect the current status of the work.

    At this time, we are not committing to bringing this capability to market.

    We will update this thread if the status changes.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joebwv commented  · 

    We have a need to Access AF elements via an OPC UA Server.
    We have third party software that gets it's data via an OPC DA Server, and that tool refers directly to Tag names.
    Those names could possibly get modified and cause many edits in the third party application, this situation has already occurred at least once.
    If we could point the third party tool to use AF Elements, exposed via the OPC US Server, then the third party tool would no longer need to change if tag names changed.

  20. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    PLANNED  ·  Ray Verhoeff responded

    We understand this feature is important and we are planning to restore it. We will give you an update on the release schedule when this is finalized.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA/PREVIEW
COMPLETED