Rafael Batista
My feedback
-
31 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
38 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
88 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
29 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
44 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rafael Batista shared this idea ·
-
22 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
77 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
-
58 votes
Rafael Batista supported this idea ·
It would be nice if there was an option or a switch which allowed the interface to use the old algorithm, so that RST and RET are not modified according to the most recent EF.