jmoulds

My feedback

  1. 72 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  PI Server  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jmoulds supported this idea  · 
  2. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Adapters  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jmoulds supported this idea  · 
  3. 159 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  PI Connectors » OPC UA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jmoulds commented  · 

    Hi OSIsoft, as others have pointed out, I'm baffled by the apparent backwards step in v2.x (i.e. no HA / failover support at the interface-level).

    However I notice that OPC UA has native support for something called "Client Failover" (see the 'OPC UA Online Reference' here: https://reference.opcfoundation.org/v104/Core/docs/Part4/6.6.1/ )

    I'm wondering if your intent is to support native OPC "Client Failover" under the new v2.x connector fork?

    For example:
    • You have two diverse PI OPC UA connectors (OPC UA 'clients') – both Active/Active – but one is operating in ‘backup’ mode
    • The OPC UA ‘server’ maintains information on it’s active client sessions
    • The ‘backup’ UA client monitors the client-session information on the UA server – and detects when the ‘active’ UA client has “failed”
    • The ‘backup’ UA client then instructs the UA server to redirect all future traffic to itself

    Is that on the cards for support in a future version of v2.x?

    jmoulds supported this idea  · 
  4. 34 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    jmoulds supported this idea  · 
  5. 166 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  PI Vision » Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jmoulds supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » System Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jmoulds supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jmoulds commented  · 

    I'd also like this - or the ability to send the PI message logs to a centralised syslog collector - as most SIEM's can consume syslog

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
TELL US MORE
EVALUATING
PLANNED
IN DEVELOPMENT
COMPLETED
DECLINED