arroyoesteban

My feedback

  1. 31 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  2. 202 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  PI Connectors » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We plan to provide users the ability to pick their tag naming convention and not worry about managing a cache file. We are working on implementing this functionality with PI Connector for OPC UA.

    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  3. 26 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  PI Server » Event Frames (EF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  4. 28 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  PI Connectors » UFL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I’m not sure why this would be needed. In the UFL connector you need to specify the name of the tag that you write to. And if that tag already exists, it will write to it. If that tag does not exist, then the connector would create that tag with your desired tag name. Why would you want the connector not to create that tag?

    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  5. 8 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  PI Vision » AF Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Vision » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    arroyoesteban shared this idea  · 
  7. 329 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  PI Server » Analytics & Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 38 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Vision » AF Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 28 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Vision » Analytics / Calculations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 
  11. 17 votes
    Sign in Sign in with OSIsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  PI Server » Asset Framework (AF)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    arroyoesteban commented  · 

    I believe having string operations in formula DRs can significantly increase the modelling flexibility of AF. We were faced with the problem of requiring to execute operations involving strings at the Attribute/subattribute Level for a variable number of attributes in certain elements. Writing an Analysis DR for every Attribute was certainly not a feasible approach. The problem could be easily solved by more advanced formula DRs (supporting strings) or alternatively with role up Analysis deploying custom functions (not only the current sum, add, etc). The latter is also a feature we would be interested in having.

    arroyoesteban supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

Posted ideas will have one of the following statuses.
Full definition of these statuses can be found on the Home Page.
No status
NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION
RESEARCHING/EVALUATING
DECLINED
PLANNED
STARTED/IN DEVELOPMENT
IN BETA/PREVIEW
COMPLETED