pete.long
My feedback
-
53 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
At this time, this item is not currently scheduled for a release of PI Vision. If this changes, this item will be updated to reflect the current status.
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
I like the idea of markers, I don't like the idea of defaulting the range to limits - default range should stay Min-Max, but if you want to add ability to switch to limits, cool rules.
As mentioned below, why limit it to Gauges - bars would benefit from this also, and it should 'Target' as well.pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Yes, please! The large font in the table makes the table big and lives room for little else, which requires you to use shrink to fit, which makes the text in the table pixelated and throws off all the other object font sizes.
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
124 votes13 comments · PI Vision » Display Management / Displays Page · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
This is one of the cooler features in ProcessBook!
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
(The new levels of 'importance' are nice for assessing how much desire there is for the item voted on, but why "Not at all"? If it really was "Not at all" important, i wouldn't have voted for it. How about, "Nice to have", or, "Make me smile", etc.?
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
212 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Only 11 votes?! People mustn't know it's here. Can do this in excel but not AF (okay, I know it's not that simple), but this, as Matt stated, is kind of a big deal.
Motor health is used in a lot of your demonstrations, but you don't want to assess motor out of spec when the motor isn't running.
You don't want to assess a cooker out of spec, when it isn't cooking.
e.g., TimeLT('amps', y, t, 'LoLo', 'motor'="Run")
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
12 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
...or, when you make a change to the template wouldn't it just change all it's elements cause that's the point of a template (I get you make provision for allowing extensions, but probably not this, as the 'purpose' or description of an analysis won't be different from element to element - that's potentially a whooooooole lotta manual resets to perform!)
-
27 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
-
31 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
At this time, this item is not currently scheduled for a release of PI Vision. If this changes, this item will be updated to reflect the current status.
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
58 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Interesting thought. Could you use a String tag and display it using a Value object? Obvious downside would be, i don't think you can word wrap a value item
-
6 votespete.long
shared this idea
·
-
76 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
-
104 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Scott, if you see this, or if an admin can...
Please change the title to "Heat Map / 3D Profiles".
...course, then the votes will blow up and it will be more awkward when it's denied ;)An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Thank you for standing up for us, @Mariana Sandin !!
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
322 votes9 comments · PI Vision » Manual Data Entry / PI Manual Logger · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We are aware of the interest in this integration, but at this time we do not have plans to integrate PI Manual Logger with PI Vision. I have updated the status of this item to reflect this.
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
523 votes
At this time, this item is not currently scheduled for a release of PI Vision. If this changes, this item will be updated to reflect the current status.
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Installed the extensibility object for this and it worked great for me, yay . . . but doesn't work for other users, and we can't figure out why - Support is already alluding to, "well, this isn't a supported object". 9 values, that's it, and the display is built and works for one. Really don't want to mess with Excel or Man Logger. Other's are saying we should use GE's Plant Applications - lol, using the competition's app to put data in PI - I don't want to go there either.
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
this is an issue that might delay our full migration from ProcessBook to Vision
pete.long
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Yes, having to rebuild just to turn an option 'off' is unfortunate. Thank you!
-
104 votes
This functionality to set default display and symbol configuration is in development for the PI Vision 2022 release.
PI Vision administrators will have the ability to assign system-wide display and symbol configuration defaults. These default settings are applied only when the symbol or the display is first created.
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
PS - even if there is a 'hidden' configuration file where the color codes can be changed
(I know, you don't want us in there...still)An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Sounds similar to this request - should they be merged? This is a significant request as it would help facilitate use of corporate standards:
pete.long
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
default colors and such settings aren't in a config file or akin somewhere? someone built the defaults into the base code? who allowed that to go into v1.0 ?
-
69 votespete.long
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment pete.long
commented
Sounds similar to this request - should they be merged? This is a significant request as it would help facilitate use of corporate standards:
Yes, often get complained to regarding this (and difficulty accessing displays in general) on mobile interface